One survey for several speakers
With several speakers, feedback often gets duplicated. A loop repeats the same question block — without building several surveys.
Training · conferences · conventions · workshops
One survey. Five speakers. One analysis.
One question block repeats per speaker. Invitations and reminders go out at the scheduled time. Registration, participation and analysis run in one tool.
Free, no time limit, no credit card.
GDPR-compliant · DPA included
Servers in Germany · certified data center
Made in Germany
Trusted by companies, universities and public institutions
An observation · no drama
The data is there — but it doesn't belong together.
Five speakers. Five feedback forms.
Invitations go out — reminders get left behind.
Registration in one system, feedback in the next, analysis in a third.
Then the data is there — but it doesn't really belong together.
What QUESTIONSTAR actually gives you
Four workflow mechanics, not four marketing promises.
Sending happens reliably
Invitations and reminders are sent at a fixed time. Not manually.
Feedback right in the room
A QR code is enough. Participants give feedback while they're still in the hall.
One flow instead of switching tools
Registration, participation and analysis run in the same system. The data stays together.
Loops · one question block for all speakers
One question block. Several speakers.
A section is built once. It appears again for each speaker.
Two ways: selection in the questionnaire ("Who was your speaker?") or handoff via link, e.g. as a personalized invitation with a URL parameter.
Result: no duplicates, a clear analysis per speaker.
Handoff to the loop · three ways
→Selection in the questionnaire. The respondent picks the speaker(s) themselves.
→URL parameter
?ref=… The link is distributed per speaker in advance.→Full loop. The respondent rates all speakers one after another.
one is enough · selectable per event
Question block · defined once
1. How clear was the talk by {speaker}?
2. How practical was the content?
3. What worked particularly well?
↓ repeats per speaker ↓
#1
Dr. K. Hofmann
Opening
#2
M. Yıldız
Workshop A
#3
Prof. L. Petrow
Keynote
#4
S. Becker
Workshop B
#5
A. Nowak
Closing
Scheduler · date and time fixed
Sending happens at the scheduled time.
Date and time are set. Three weeks before: invitation. The day before: reminder. The day after: feedback request.
No relative sending ("2 hours later") — fixed times instead. In return, reliably plannable.
−21 dscheduled
Invitation · Save the date
Wed, May 13 · 09:00
−1 dscheduled
Reminder to participants
Wed, Jun 3 · 17:00
+1 dscheduled
Feedback request · loop active
Fri, Jun 5 · 10:00
Lifecycle · one tool for all phases
One flow instead of three tools.
Registration can account for capacity. Participation happens through the same access. Analysis draws on the same data.
That creates a continuous process — with no breaks between systems.
✓ completed
Registration
Capacity: 50 / 50 · auto-stop
→
● live
Participation
QR code in the hall · 47 check-ins
→
● live
Analysis
Loop per speaker · 38 responses
Concrete applications
Four event scenarios where it really helps.
Public administration academy
Several speakers in one day. One survey is enough — and each rating stays separately analyzable.
Academic conference
Many sessions, similar structure. Loops keep the feedback comparable without setting up each session anew.
Corporate roadshow
Several dates at different locations. Invitations and reminders can be scheduled for each date.
Association / congress
Multi-day events with many program items. Feedback stays consistent — without combining several tools.
Common questions
What you should know upfront.
How does the loop mechanic work?
A question block is repeated per speaker — either by selection in the questionnaire or via a personalized link.
When are invitations sent?
At a fixed time (date + time). No relative sending.
Can we combine registration and feedback?
Yes, in the same tool. Shared contact list, the scheduler controls the phases.
Can we limit capacity?
Yes, registration closes automatically once capacity is reached (e.g. a seminar with 50 seats).
Are there QR codes for the hall?
Yes, generated automatically. A standard QR without your own logo / colors in the code.
Is there real-time analysis?
Yes, up to about 2,000 responses without issue. For larger events, please coordinate in advance.
Can speakers see their score?
Yes, if scoring is configured.
Are ratings anonymous?
Yes, adjustable in detail.
Can we compare events?
Via filters in the analysis (no dedicated multi-event dashboard).
Where is the data stored?
In German IONOS data centers. Details on /security.
Can we customize branding per event?
Yes, logo and colors per event. Optionally several brandings in one survey too — with a bit of configuration.
Can we pass data to Zoom / Teams / Eventbrite?
Webhook, Zapier or n8n are available. Direct embedding into Zoom or Teams isn't standard — but the link in the chat works reliably.
Ready?
Ready for event feedback without the detours?
You can start right away. No contract, no commitment. Stop whenever you like.
Kostenlos, ohne Zeitlimit und Kreditkarte.